After an intense debate today over whether or not to allow the sale of raw milk, lawmakers advanced the bill by Carencro Rep. Stephen Ortego.

Ciera Majors spoke to the House Agriculture Committee in favor of the measure that would allow farmers to sell raw milk to consumers.

"The only argument that the opposition has for this bill is 'death of a child, death of a child,'" said Majors. "Trust me! I want to protect my children. I wanted to give them a healthy product so much so that I bought two cows."

Majors argued that families should have the right to choose the foods they consume and provide for their children.

Marksville Rep. Robert Johnson said he strongly opposes the bill. He told Majors that his problem with the measure isn't that she milks her own cows and gives the raw milk to her children.

I want to protect my children. I wanted to give them a healthy product so much so that I bought two cows.

"My problem is that you don't want (the Department of Health and Hospitals) to do any kind of inspection, any kind of permitting process," said Johnson. "And then you want to exempt yourself from any kind of liability just in case somebody messes up. And when you say child...'death of a child'...that's a very serious thing to me."

One raw milk supporter, Audry Salvador, told Johnson it would be the responsibility of the consumer to check up on a farmer's reputation.

But Johnson told Salvador he has a major problem with farmers being exempt from liability if someone gets sick from raw milk.

The sale of raw milk is illegal because it was thought to have carried certain diseases that have been eradicated in the U.S. since the turn of the century, according to Ortego.

The vote was 9-6 and now heads to the House Floor.